Sunday 1 May 2016

A COINCIDENCE IN THE ARABIAN DESERT

Where do you start telling a bizarre story? Probably right at the start, not so? Now I will ask you where is the start of such a story? The setting for this story is in the Arabic desert in Dubai. Shall I then start with the beginning of the Arabian desert? Maybe I shall start telling you about that court case about Islam that I read 30 years ago? Well, let me just start somewhere.

My wife Annemarié Coertse and our son Niel with
Daniel Brawn in the Arabian Desert

Our son Niel practises in Dubai as a lawyer for the last 10 months. Annemarié and I visited him middle April 2016. Prior to us going, I asked him to arrange visits to the houses of parliament, the Highest Court in Dubai and another place or two. That request met with some resistance from his side with the strong retort: “Dad, you shouldn’t pluck out your camera and start shooting. It is not South Africa.”

I decided to keep a low profile and not to arrange anything and left all arrangements in his hands. That was the better part of wisdom. When we arrived there he had everything planned to perfection. He arranged a dune bashing trip with his colleague Daniel Brawn. 

Annemarié went with Niel in his Jeep and Daniel and I were in his Jeep.


Daniel comes from the UK and is 63 years old having started his career as a welder. He then decided he does not want to grow old with all sorts of career injuries and he enrolled at a University in the UK studying ancient history and archaeology. He had a growing family and he couldn’t survive on the income from this field of study. Then he started law and ended with a doctorate in law. As I have stated above, he and Niel are now at the same international firm of lawyers in Dubai.

Daniel lived for some time as a child in South Africa where his dad was a political activist telling his story by making movies. As a child he met with a number of well-known activists and he was in the same class as Sir Seretse Khama’s, the previous president of Botswana, son Lieutenant General Ian Khama.

Niel, on the other hand also developed his career. First of all, he was vehemently opposed to academic studies and started as cabinet maker working amongst others on Mr Harry Oppenheimer’s furniture. Then he qualified as a lawyer and now works in Dubai.

Now I ask you another question: What are the chances that I would have met Daniel Brawn in the Arabian desert during April 2016 and discussing, amongst others, this court case about Islam that I read some 30 years ago and have never ever even given it another thought? Well, it happened and I met him and we were bashing dunes and seeing the odd camel or stopping at an oasis.

The odd camel wandering around

While I was with Daniel, Annemarié was having a go at the dunes with her eyes closed and yelling. She describes her ordeal as exactly the same as if in an amusement park but that it lasted three hours.

Daniel and I had the most extraordinary conversation in his Jeep. Niel asked him afterwards, why did he every now and again slow down considerably? Daniel explained: “Niel, that was when your dad and I were discussing something important.”

He is now researching the ancient history of Dubai and more specifically its social structures and the different sects found in Islam. That was the time that I referred to that South African court case. We also discussed the case the EFF recently won against Jacob Zuma. I told him that I read that case en route to Rome in the aeroplane while my fellow passengers were glued to the tiny TV screens watching movies. I gave Daniel my copy with my manuscript notes on it and he promised to read it, which he subsequently did.

I am sure you still remember the meeting when Professor Himla Sootyal delivered her lecture at our West Gauteng Branch on DNA and when she recommended a book by Bryan Sykes: THE SEVEN DAUGHTERS OF EVE. Back in South Africa I sent Daniel a reading list inclusive of this book.

We also discussed Cheik Anta Diop’s book THE AFRICAN ORIGIN OF CIVILIZATION. He undertook to obtain his own copy and read it.

He then guided us to an archaeological site deep inside the desert that is apparently 120 000 years old. There he showed us where that community lived and buried their loved ones. Burial, you should bear in mind, is one of the important markers that sets us for ever apart from the animal kingdom. The other marker is agriculture. Bryan Sykes grows lyrical about these facts; it struck me forcefully that these markers are indeed most remarkable and that nothing, not even our technological advances, can compare with these two markers: agriculture and burials.

The archaeological site where there was
a community living about 120 000 years ago with
some of the graves visible

In these photos you will see caves where the ancients buried their loved ones. I venture to state that these photos must be probably some of the oldest one can get – it is certainly much older than Sterkfontein’s graves [Link to the Genealogical Society of South Africa's Cemetry Recording Project] we photographed some time ago. While we were there, it was only the wind you could hear blowing softly over these ancient sites as if the wind was accentuating the ancient secrets buried thousands of years ago – these sites are not going to yield its secrets easily. I think that if you listen carefully to the wind and keep on digging, you will eventually discover some of their secrets. Daniel says that when you sleep out in the desert, at night you can hear the sand rolling down the dunes.

A couple of kilometres from there but within walking distance, there was a small village with camels out on the desert sand. They are living within earshot from this site. On the face of the desert sand there is nothing to eke out a living let alone to educate your kids or keep your camel farm going. How do they manage?

When you travel in the Eastern Cape or Zambia or Zimbabwe, there is always some sound somewhere in the distance. Here, in this desert I only heard the wind.

The wind blowing softly over this ancient site, is still howling in my ears.

The graves of the ancients

Please read those books – you never know whom you might meet thirty years from now!
[Links to Cheik Anta Diop on Wikipedia; and another video clip]
[Link to Bryan Sykes on Wikipedia]

It was a mind changing encounter with Daniel Brawn and I want to go back to spend time with Daniel in the desert and to meet with the nomads.



Back from the desert we had to inflate the tires
for normal road conditions

I think that the meeting with Daniel was serendipitous to the extreme. I never thought that I would visit a place such as Dubai, let alone meeting a man such a Daniel Brawn, bashing dunes up and down and having these amazing conversations somewhere in the Arabic desert.

Thank you Daniel Brawn for taking time and that you spent it with us.


Miracles do happen – even in the Arabic desert.

Please drop me an e-mail at neelscoertse@wirelessza.co.za

Neels Coertse
Editor West Gauteng Newsletter
Branch of the Genealogical Society of 
South Africa [Link to the West Gauteng Branch's Newsletters]
30 April 2016

[This article was first published on behalf the West Gauteng Branch of the Genealogical Society of South Africa on 30 April 2016]








Thursday 28 April 2016

THE CONTORTIONIST IS STILL ON THE THRONE CALLED NKANDLA

My wife and I are back from our short but eventful holiday in Rome & Dubai. Our spirits soared like Jonathan Livingstone's Seagull - a seagull that guided me on top of St Peter's Basilica and I was fortunate to have captured and to now share it with you.


I experienced a blessing.

Back in our sunny country I soon realised that even with the Guptas on the face of it no longer in South Africa, that sham of a man whom I call THE CONTORTIONIST is still on the throne of Nkandla. And that he is still laughing even in the face of Judge Yacoob telling him to abdicate. Remember this judge? He said he disagreed with the acquittal of Zuma on charges of rape; later the judge pulled the same trick as every politician by pack peddling or adjusting what he really said. Just bear this in mind.

There are very prominent South Africans who called on the Contortionist to go [nobody is brave enough the suggest where this chappie should go to, and they all leave it up to our own imaginations]. You may want to see who those South Africans are - you may read about some of them here.

I have a video clip wherein the ex Finance Minister Trevor Manuel says he thinks it is a good thing if Zuma quits. Watch this video and pay attention more or less at 10:15 where he sets out his views. Manuel is of the view that the Contortionist violated the Constitution - and I agree with Manuel. Here is another link wherein Stephen Groote writes about this video clip as well.

In the meantime I will leave you for now and thank you for reading my blog. Here's one to Zuma, the ultimate Contortionist - I took a snapshot of this Rolls Royce while we were in Dubai; I really don't know whether it belong[ed] to either one of the Guptas or maybe ex Minister of Finance Van Rooyen or maybe en route to SA for the Contortionist.



Wednesday 6 April 2016

SHORT HOLIDAY/RESEARCH AWAY FROM OFFICE

Kosmos


I will not update my blog for at least two weeks. My wife and I are going to Rome for inter alia research in the Vatican Library, visits to the Italy's Houses of Parliament & the Supreme Court of Appeal.

Then we are off to Dubai to visit our son.

In the meantime please have a look at the video clip of Mr Trevor Manuel advising the Contortionist to "... step aside ..." I do hope that is what he said and that he will not come back two days from now to retract what he said. On the other hand, the Contortionist's footwork is exemplary, don't you think? He even came off the rapes charge against him. What does Manuel mean "... to step aside ..."?

Tuesday 5 April 2016

ICELANDIC's PRIME MINISTER RESIGNS IN THE WAKE OF THE PANAMA PAPERS SCANDAL

Sigmundur David Gunnlaugsson
the ex-PM of Iceland

News headlines report that the Icelandic's Prime Minister Sigmundur David Gunnlaugsson has resigned in the wake of the ever growing Panama paper scandal - read it here. That was the honourable thing to do. I suggest to you the PM is an educated man with some sort of self respect and integrity.

Even Richard Nixon eventually resigned - and it is rather trite that he was somewhat of a rogue president. Read it here.

Well, while writing this blogpost I am thinking of Mr Seb Blatter - eventually that guy also resigned. He tried to put up a fight but then he did the honourable thing as well and resigned. Read it here.

In our rainbow country? Can we expect that from our leaders? Absolutely not!

Zuma claimed to be innocent. And yet the Con Court brought out a devastating judgment against the man as well as against the honourable Baleka Mbete and they are clinging to power. Read the Con Court judgment here. Honourable people? Not in your life!

And of course Parliament chucked out a motion to impeach the Contortionist - read it here. It comes as no surprise.

I suggest to you that both Zuma, the ANC and the Government are totally oblivious of the import of the Con Court judgment. They are totally inept to grasp the fundamental truths contained in the judgment. They are complete failures. They lack the capacity to appreciate the constitutional crisis they are creating because they are fools.




ICELAND'S PRIME MINISTER SHOULD TAKE LESSONS FROM OUR CONTORTIONIST

Iceland's PM is a rookie in respect of avoiding difficult situations. He doesn't know how to handle it. He pulled the same trick or stunt the late old Advocate John Vorster [do you still remember that man?] pulled on journalists many moons ago. John walked out of the SABC's studios when his pants were on fire from the hot seat he occupied.

This scandalous behaviour of the Icelandic PM is a sequel from those famous/infamous Panama documents-leaks that are now splashed all over the world.

Sigmundur Davíð Gunnlaugsson
Prime Minister of Iceland


Sigmundur Davíð Gunnlaugsson, the PM of Iceland, did exactly the same. He alleged that he was "tricked" into the interview and then he just walked out. Just like that. Do you want to look how the PM did it? Click here. It is fascinating to watch.

No, oh no, Mr PM. That is not the way to handle matters - especially when the questions are getting tough. It is obvious that you are a rookie [I say this with the greatest of respect sir, but it is abundantly clear that it was inappropriate behaviour from your side.]

Sigmund - have a close look at how to behave.
Man o man, that's the way to do it.
The contortionist in Parliament

We in SA have an expert in avoiding trickery, avoiding facts, avoiding sinister dealings, avoiding parliament [even when the majority of members our rainbow parliament are his lapdog], avoiding our highest court views about his trickery and sinister behaviour. He is also a past master in blame shifting. He can even plead "Not guilty" with a straight face. Yes, it is our own Contortionist Jacob.

I am absolutely positive that our guy will teach/train/guide you how to handle it - provided that you get past the Gupta-family [who are, so it seems, the real government or power behind the presidential throne and further provided that you pay a handsome amount in that offshore accounts that you and you wifey holds. Please remember it should be for the benefit of the Contortionist or his nephew]. Don't try your luck with ex-Minister of Finance David Van Rooyen - he could only hang in for a mere five days before he got fired. He was not quick enough to get the keys to the strong room where all our money are kept [Oh my word! I do hope that there is something left].

He will of course also introduce you to his legal team and afterwards you can blame them for your actions. He will also introduce you to his service providers for shady deals.

Sunday 3 April 2016

THE CONTORTIONIST IS A HUMBLE MAN!!! AND INNOCENT!!

THE CONTORTIONIST
ON HIS WAY OUT OF THE BOX

Yip! You can see it before your eyes!
It is happening right now!

Our humble President, Jacob Zuma - he is not to blame for anything because he was innocent and everybody else is to blame. On that score why for crying out loud should such a humble man resign from such an elevated office? Do you think that I sucked it out of my thumb? [By George, I am not the President] - you can read it here

Why on earth would I then go on and make the far fetched statement that the Contortionist is blameless? Read this quote below by clicking here:

“In his television address Zuma took refuge behind the legal advice that he claimed had informed his original approach, citing the Western Cape High Court decision. This can only be described as an outrageously brazen and disingenuous ex post facto re-framing of the history of the matter. said he did not do this on purpose."

Ahmed Kathrada writes: “And bluntly, if not arrogantly; in the face of such persistently widespread criticism, condemnation and demand, is it asking too much to express the hope that you will choose the correct way that is gaining momentum, to consider stepping down?”

You can read that statement here.

I submit that the Contortionist is ... innocent? arrogant? clinging to power? disingenuous? My dear follower I suggest that you are well informed about the entire matter and that you will be able to complete this sentence far more eloquently than I can do. So I really ask you to complete it to your satisfaction,

 One thing is for sure: the Contortionist is not going to resign. The ANC will not recall this man. We are stuck with this farce. He is on his way out of the box - with the compliments of the ANC.



Thursday 31 March 2016

ZUMA THE CONTORTIONIST


Zuma the contortionist
[thank you Wikipedia for this image {link}]

But Zuma has survived every scandal and allegation against him because he is able to wriggle out of responsibility for his actions. He will attempt to do so again on the Nkandla matter because of the strategy he employed throughout the saga." [My emphasis]. Sorry guys, there was no space for the shower head. His signal is that he is on his way out of the box.


The Con Court

I think it would be disrespectful to congratulate the Con Court for its judgment. Why do I say that? Because that is what a court of law should do: deliver judgment without fear. In other words, the Con Court complied with its duties and calling as the protector of law and order. If only Zuma and the National Assembly had that integrity!! Wishful thinking.

The same argument would hold water in respect of the Public Protector and the present incumbent Adv Thuli Madonsela. She complied with her high calling to be impartial, objective and in this day and age to be fearless and steadfast. Not so Zuma and cohorts.

MSN news has this to say about Zuma and the Con Court judgment: you can read the full article here:

"But Zuma will not simply surrender. He is still holding an ace card and could drag the ANC down with him. By RANJENI MUNUSAMY.

In light of the binding ruling that both the president and the National Assembly acted unlawfully and in contravention of their constitutional obligations, can they retain their legitimacy? Can they be trusted to perform their functions for the remainder of their term? While the Constitutional Court affirmed the remedial action determined by the Public Protector for the sins of the Nkandla upgrades, there is no remedy prescribed for Zuma and the National Assembly being in breach of the Constitution and the law.

Zuma has caused so much reputational damage to the ANC, has failed in his leadership responsibilities and has brought the organisation into disrepute on so many issues that the Constitutional Court judgement should not even be needed as a basis to remove him from office.

But Zuma has survived every scandal and allegation against him because he is able to wriggle out of responsibility for his actions. He will attempt to do so again on the Nkandla matter because of the strategy he employed throughout the saga." [My emphasis].

I refer you to my previous blog write-up about two judges