Tuesday 5 April 2016

ICELANDIC's PRIME MINISTER RESIGNS IN THE WAKE OF THE PANAMA PAPERS SCANDAL

Sigmundur David Gunnlaugsson
the ex-PM of Iceland

News headlines report that the Icelandic's Prime Minister Sigmundur David Gunnlaugsson has resigned in the wake of the ever growing Panama paper scandal - read it here. That was the honourable thing to do. I suggest to you the PM is an educated man with some sort of self respect and integrity.

Even Richard Nixon eventually resigned - and it is rather trite that he was somewhat of a rogue president. Read it here.

Well, while writing this blogpost I am thinking of Mr Seb Blatter - eventually that guy also resigned. He tried to put up a fight but then he did the honourable thing as well and resigned. Read it here.

In our rainbow country? Can we expect that from our leaders? Absolutely not!

Zuma claimed to be innocent. And yet the Con Court brought out a devastating judgment against the man as well as against the honourable Baleka Mbete and they are clinging to power. Read the Con Court judgment here. Honourable people? Not in your life!

And of course Parliament chucked out a motion to impeach the Contortionist - read it here. It comes as no surprise.

I suggest to you that both Zuma, the ANC and the Government are totally oblivious of the import of the Con Court judgment. They are totally inept to grasp the fundamental truths contained in the judgment. They are complete failures. They lack the capacity to appreciate the constitutional crisis they are creating because they are fools.




ICELAND'S PRIME MINISTER SHOULD TAKE LESSONS FROM OUR CONTORTIONIST

Iceland's PM is a rookie in respect of avoiding difficult situations. He doesn't know how to handle it. He pulled the same trick or stunt the late old Advocate John Vorster [do you still remember that man?] pulled on journalists many moons ago. John walked out of the SABC's studios when his pants were on fire from the hot seat he occupied.

This scandalous behaviour of the Icelandic PM is a sequel from those famous/infamous Panama documents-leaks that are now splashed all over the world.

Sigmundur Davíð Gunnlaugsson
Prime Minister of Iceland


Sigmundur Davíð Gunnlaugsson, the PM of Iceland, did exactly the same. He alleged that he was "tricked" into the interview and then he just walked out. Just like that. Do you want to look how the PM did it? Click here. It is fascinating to watch.

No, oh no, Mr PM. That is not the way to handle matters - especially when the questions are getting tough. It is obvious that you are a rookie [I say this with the greatest of respect sir, but it is abundantly clear that it was inappropriate behaviour from your side.]

Sigmund - have a close look at how to behave.
Man o man, that's the way to do it.
The contortionist in Parliament

We in SA have an expert in avoiding trickery, avoiding facts, avoiding sinister dealings, avoiding parliament [even when the majority of members our rainbow parliament are his lapdog], avoiding our highest court views about his trickery and sinister behaviour. He is also a past master in blame shifting. He can even plead "Not guilty" with a straight face. Yes, it is our own Contortionist Jacob.

I am absolutely positive that our guy will teach/train/guide you how to handle it - provided that you get past the Gupta-family [who are, so it seems, the real government or power behind the presidential throne and further provided that you pay a handsome amount in that offshore accounts that you and you wifey holds. Please remember it should be for the benefit of the Contortionist or his nephew]. Don't try your luck with ex-Minister of Finance David Van Rooyen - he could only hang in for a mere five days before he got fired. He was not quick enough to get the keys to the strong room where all our money are kept [Oh my word! I do hope that there is something left].

He will of course also introduce you to his legal team and afterwards you can blame them for your actions. He will also introduce you to his service providers for shady deals.

Sunday 3 April 2016

THE CONTORTIONIST IS A HUMBLE MAN!!! AND INNOCENT!!

THE CONTORTIONIST
ON HIS WAY OUT OF THE BOX

Yip! You can see it before your eyes!
It is happening right now!

Our humble President, Jacob Zuma - he is not to blame for anything because he was innocent and everybody else is to blame. On that score why for crying out loud should such a humble man resign from such an elevated office? Do you think that I sucked it out of my thumb? [By George, I am not the President] - you can read it here

Why on earth would I then go on and make the far fetched statement that the Contortionist is blameless? Read this quote below by clicking here:

“In his television address Zuma took refuge behind the legal advice that he claimed had informed his original approach, citing the Western Cape High Court decision. This can only be described as an outrageously brazen and disingenuous ex post facto re-framing of the history of the matter. said he did not do this on purpose."

Ahmed Kathrada writes: “And bluntly, if not arrogantly; in the face of such persistently widespread criticism, condemnation and demand, is it asking too much to express the hope that you will choose the correct way that is gaining momentum, to consider stepping down?”

You can read that statement here.

I submit that the Contortionist is ... innocent? arrogant? clinging to power? disingenuous? My dear follower I suggest that you are well informed about the entire matter and that you will be able to complete this sentence far more eloquently than I can do. So I really ask you to complete it to your satisfaction,

 One thing is for sure: the Contortionist is not going to resign. The ANC will not recall this man. We are stuck with this farce. He is on his way out of the box - with the compliments of the ANC.



Thursday 31 March 2016

ZUMA THE CONTORTIONIST


Zuma the contortionist
[thank you Wikipedia for this image {link}]

But Zuma has survived every scandal and allegation against him because he is able to wriggle out of responsibility for his actions. He will attempt to do so again on the Nkandla matter because of the strategy he employed throughout the saga." [My emphasis]. Sorry guys, there was no space for the shower head. His signal is that he is on his way out of the box.


The Con Court

I think it would be disrespectful to congratulate the Con Court for its judgment. Why do I say that? Because that is what a court of law should do: deliver judgment without fear. In other words, the Con Court complied with its duties and calling as the protector of law and order. If only Zuma and the National Assembly had that integrity!! Wishful thinking.

The same argument would hold water in respect of the Public Protector and the present incumbent Adv Thuli Madonsela. She complied with her high calling to be impartial, objective and in this day and age to be fearless and steadfast. Not so Zuma and cohorts.

MSN news has this to say about Zuma and the Con Court judgment: you can read the full article here:

"But Zuma will not simply surrender. He is still holding an ace card and could drag the ANC down with him. By RANJENI MUNUSAMY.

In light of the binding ruling that both the president and the National Assembly acted unlawfully and in contravention of their constitutional obligations, can they retain their legitimacy? Can they be trusted to perform their functions for the remainder of their term? While the Constitutional Court affirmed the remedial action determined by the Public Protector for the sins of the Nkandla upgrades, there is no remedy prescribed for Zuma and the National Assembly being in breach of the Constitution and the law.

Zuma has caused so much reputational damage to the ANC, has failed in his leadership responsibilities and has brought the organisation into disrepute on so many issues that the Constitutional Court judgement should not even be needed as a basis to remove him from office.

But Zuma has survived every scandal and allegation against him because he is able to wriggle out of responsibility for his actions. He will attempt to do so again on the Nkandla matter because of the strategy he employed throughout the saga." [My emphasis].

I refer you to my previous blog write-up about two judges

ZUMA YOU MUST GO NOW - BE A MAN OF HONOUR AND RESIGN


ZUMA dealt a blow by the
Constitutional Court!!!

Constitutional Court in session

Zuma must go now - he failed to uphold the Constitution. The National Assembly protected this man and failed therefor to uphold the Constitution.

What a disgrace is the man - not the Presidency. What a disgrace is the National Assembly in all its shameful glory.

You can read the full judgment of the CC by clicking here.

The Con Court delivered a unanimous decision and said inter alia:
 
"Consistent with this constitutional injunction, an order will thus be made that the President’s failure to comply with the remedial action taken against him by the Public Protector is inconsistent with his obligations to uphold, defend and respect the Constitution as the supreme law of the Republic; to comply with the remedial action taken by the Public Protector; and the duty to assist and protect the office of the Public Protector to ensure its independence, impartiality, dignity and effectiveness.

Similarly, the failure by the National Assembly to hold the President accountable by ensuring that he complies with the remedial action taken against him, is inconsistent with its obligations to scrutinise and oversee executive action and to maintain oversight of the exercise of executive powers by the President.  And in particular, to give urgent attention to or intervene by facilitating his compliance with the remedial action."

It is very clear that the President is a failure as well as the National Assembly. Vavi called for Zuma to go and he called that the National Assembly should also go. You can read it here.

Madonsela is, according to the Court, the Biblical David that slayed the Nkandla giant - you can read it here.

Does any body really think that this man will go?

You can also see a youtube video when this matter was argued in the Con Court by clicking here.

Friday 25 March 2016

POWER OF ATTORNEY with an example



FROM MY LEGAL LIBRARY


POWER OF ATTORNEY

What is a power of attorney? [pa] In short it is when you give someone else the authority to do something on your behalf.

EXAMPLE ONE: You can give someone the authority to do one specific thing for instance: to buy on your behalf a specific motor vehicle for a specific price and not more. Once your agent bought that specific motor vehicle at that specific price, the power of attorney lapses or comes to an automatic end.

EXAMPLE TWO: You give someone the power of attorney to attend to your affairs for exactly 12 months – and at the anniversary it comes to an end.

EXAMPLE THREE: You give someone the power of attorney to act on your behalf for an unlimited period of time.

In all three examples you may terminate it without giving any reasons to the other.

HOW DO YOU EXECUTE A POWER OF ATTORNEY? It is a legal document that you write out and sign it. The other person does not have to accept it. If the other does not accept it, he/she can do so explicitly or tacitly [that is he/she is simply not acting in terms of the power of attorney].

The court will always go behind the power of attorney to discover the true nature of the transaction.

I give you herewith an example of a simple general power of attorney. You are however strongly advised to seek professional help for your specific needs.



 [THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF A SIMPLE GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY.

I STRONGLY ADVISE YOU TO SEEK PROFESSIONAL

ASSISTANCE FOR YOUR SPECIFIC NEEDS]

GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN WHOM IT MAY CONCERN THAT

 I, the undersigned

[FILL IN FULL NAMES & SURNAME]

IDENTITY NUMBER: [FILL IN THE NUMBER]

ADRESS [FILL IN THE EXACT PHYSICAL ADDRESS]



Do hereby nominate, constitute and appoint [FILL IN FULL NAMES & SURNAME] [IDENTITY NUMBER [FILL IN THE NUMBER]] of ADRESS [FILL IN THE EXACT PHYSICAL ADDRESS] with power of substitution to be my lawful agent in my name, place and stead, to represent me and to exercise all my powers aforesaid as fully and effectually as I might or could do if personally present and acting in person without in any way detracting from the powers aforesaid and I hereby authorise my agent:

 1.       To collect monies, give and grant receipts, quittances and discharges, and to compound any claims in the said estate.
2.       To prosecute, defend, abandon, compromise or take on appeal any legal proceedings brought by or against the estate.
3.       To open and operate a banking account in my name at [Fill name of the Bank] Bank on my behalf and to sign or endorse any negotiable instruments for and on behalf of the estate.
4.       To invest and deal with any investments belonging to the estate and to consent to the cancellation or release of any securities.
5.       To sell movable and immovable property, shares, stocks and securities belonging to the estate and for such price and upon such terms as my agent in his sole discretion deem fit and to give transfer thereof to any purchaser or purchasers.
6.       To sign any estate accounts and all documents that may be necessary or required in connection with or arising out of the administration of the estate.
7.       To transfer from the estate movable to any person or persons entitled thereto by reason of purchase, bequest, legacy or otherwise howsoever and to sign all or any documents required to give effect to such transfer.

And generally for effecting the purposes aforesaid, to do or cause to be done whatsoever shall be requisite, as fully and effectually, for all intents and purposes, as I might or could do if personally present and acting herein, hereby ratifying, allowing and confirming and promising and agreeing to ratify, allow and confirm all and whatsoever my agent shall lawfully do or cause to be done, by virtue of these presents.

DATED AT                 ON THIS     DAY OF 2016

_________________________________________             ________

[FILL IN YOUR FULL NAMES & SURNAME]             WITNESS

IDENTITY NUMBER: [FILL IN THE NUMBER]


Wednesday 23 March 2016

STATE CAPTURE: SOUTH AFRICA

This a concept that is floating around in our beautiful country as if it is an everyday point of discussion. This concept is brandied about as if every Tom, Dick and Harry knows the full import thereof.  


Wikipedia gives it this definition:

State capture is a type of systemic political corruption in which private interests significantly influence a state's decision-making processes to their own advantage through unobvious channels, that may not be illegal. The influence may be through a range of state institutions, including the legislature, executive, ministries and the judiciary. It is thus similar to regulatory capture but differs through the wider variety of bodies through which it may be exercised and because, unlike regulatory capture, the influence is never overt.”

[Source: click here]

On 10 March 2016 the DAILY MAVERICK asked the question under this heading: “State capture: Did the Guptas offer Treasury's top job to Deputy Minister Jonas?” [Source: click here ]

It is if the Daily Maverick pre-empted the happenings, not so?

In light of Wikipedia’s quotation, it is necessary to take notice of what happened in my country during the previous weeks or so; especially when you consider wat the Deputy Minister of Finance Mr Mcebisi Jonas said on 16 March 2016. He states categorically that the Gupta-family offered him the portfolio in the Cabinet as Minister of Finance. [Source: for the full text of his statement click here]

I wonder what Mr David Douglas Van Rooyen would disclose one day? [Do you remember him? He was the man who held on to his Ministerial appointment for exactly five days [Source: click here]

And of course the Gupta-family denies it and challenged him to proof it [Source: click here]

The very same day a former senior ANC politician Me Vytjie Mentor disclosed in THE SOUTH AFRICAN.COM that the Gupta’s offered her a job in the Cabinet as well [Source: click here for the full text of her “bomb” This time the honourable President Zuma tried another trick. He pleaded amnesia – he cannot remember ever meeting her.

Vytjie’s response was hugely interesting: “I chaired the ANC national parliamentary caucus when President Zuma was a Deputy President. He sat next to me and spoke through me and with me in Caucus each Thursday when Parliament was in session.” This was only one incident that she mentions. She mentions others as well.

What does our President Jacob Zuma do? Resign? Of course not! What does the ANC high command do? Recall him like they recalled President Thabo Mbeki? Of course not. That is why the image below reminds me of Zuma: he laughs all the way to Nkandla and the Bank.

Zuma laughing!

I suggest to you that in any other country where there are inter alia ethical standards, integrity, quality leadership, morality and decency the President would have resigned without any one calling for his resignation. Not our beloved President – he stays put and laughs.