God is making something new - for us humans and plants

 Look at my brunsvigia radulosa sprouting after winter - those blue dots are indicating some of it

God is maming something new – and it has already begun; and it is, so to say, all about us humans and nature. The source for this amazing news is in the Book of Isaiah chapter 43. The English version reads: Verses 18 – 19: [English Standard Version]:

“Remember not the former things, nor consider the things of old. Behold, I am doing a new thing: now it springs forth, do you not perceive it?  I will make a way in the wilderness and rivers in the desert.”

You may consider that this is also a brand-new blog post – in a way it is. Let’s go about telling you about something new that is happening in my life [remember to tell me what is new right now in your life?] I urged our Bible study group to post for the next few days to Sunday 11 September 2022 [7x new stories] about something new happening in their lives. And the one elderly member was so excited when she said: “I had a brand-new cup of tea this morning.” Yes – she is thankful for a new fresh cuppa.

And I? I am thankful for my Brunsvigia radulosa. I sowed some seeds February - March 2021 and it sprouted. The plants die right back into the soil. And then, it sprouts round beginning of spring. I am so happy to welcome them back above ground. They were just resting from the ordeal of living above ground.

The same brunsvigia radulosa on 26 March 2021

This is what they looked like during covid-19 26 March 2021:

And this is what they now look like while sprouting from deep under the soil – this is resilience. Covered by soil; completely hidden. Now, there is life! On 5 September 2022 there is new life sprouting from underneath the soil.

Another lady posted a photograph of a tree across the street of a tree that is awash with brand new flowers.

This is the tree from across the street

Another gentleman is so proud of his poppy seeds pushing new flowers – his first success after many failed attempts in the past.

My friend's poppies flowering

Another gentleman tells us that he was successful navigating his daughter in law’s vehicle and to tune into the radio of that car.

I spoke to an erstwhile client of mine [thirty years ago] and she was happy to speak to me after so many years of silence. She called our conversation a blessing – and I do agree wholeheartedly with her. She told me she was healed by the Spirit of God from a deeply troublesome trauma in her life – and I could hear in her voice how sincere she was.

What are you grateful for and for what is new in your life right now?

Tomorrow? No, I am concerned about today 5 September 2022 and not tomorrow. It will come, but not yet. Let’s live today and see the new things in your and my lives.

Please write me a letter: neelscoertse@wirelessza.co.za

 

Read More

 

The crucified Christ – full of sores and muck

Look at this magnificent altar piece commonly accepted that Matthias Grünewald is the artist who painted it between 1510 – 1515. Bear in mind that there was much controversy about who the author was. Is it magnificent? Maybe it is better to describe it as gruesome?

And have a good look at the companion painting telling us the story of Christ’s resurrection; the strong macho soldiers are prostrate before the mighty angels and the momentous historical happening.

The resurrection – Isenheim Altarpiece

I highly recommend you to click on the link and to read the write-up about these paintings and carvings. And to think on it.

I, as a practising lawyer, do not want to get involved in this controversy for a simple reason, I don’t know anything about it. My new found friend, Gert Swart, from Pietermaritzburg in KZN, introduced me to this work of art. Thank you Gert for these two images. He provided the images. He is passionate artist!

There is another reason why I focus on the content of these two paintings: I have accepted these facts to be beyond reasonable doubt of the crucifixion and the resurrection – this is even in the face of all the contrary arguments and more so the modern arguments levelled at this.

Maybe it is settled, by now, that the real author was Matthias Grünewald; and I will accept that proposition. Yes, for the purposes of this write-up, I accept it as such. Having said that, there is always the die-hards who won’t accept it.

Yet, I want to get to another “reading” of these masterpieces – I want to focus on both the crucifixion and the resurrection depicted in these two paintings. I suggest to you that there are different ways to read a painting or a sculpture or a piece of literature.

When I listen to radio broadcasts, watching the news on TV and listening to conversations of friends, and people in the street, I am acutely aware that our society [that is locally and internationally] is terminally ill. Mathias’ crucified Christ reminds us about that as well.

When I refer to the conversations on the street, I am also reminded about Svetlana Alexievch’s book SECONDHAND TIME: here is an essay: click here. She wandered through the streets of Moscow and her home town Belarus with an old-fashioned tape recorder to record these street conversations – eventually she wrote it down and she was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for literature. I agree with the judges who awarded her that Prize.

And of course, this award was attacked and criticised and it was shot down, so to speak. Once again, a controversy broke out about this award; fortunately, the judges remained steadfast and proceeded with the ceremony.

Controversy, controversy, controversy – that is the spice of life. Controversy is as ubiquitous as is your cup of coffee! I am of the view that the first controversy arose shortly after Cain slaughtered his brother Abel; or it may have been somewhat earlier on between Adam and his wife, Eve, about her generous offer to eat a forbidden fruit? And this state of affairs is remains with us throughout history. It seems as if we always get distracted from the message and we focus on the “controversy.” Today I am going to focus on the message and not the so-called controversy; what is the message of this altar piece? I suggest to you that it is abundantly clear and unambiguous.

Now you might say to me that the crucifixion as well as the resurrection are hugely controversial? And you are spot on – and it is not done yet. Up to this point of me writing this, the Cross of Christ and His resurrection are riddled with controversy; mostly wild speculation.

I am alive to these difficulties pertaining to the Christ message. Let me take you back to a couple of days after He was judicially murdered and miraculously resurrected, the disciples and other like-minded people were behind closed doors when the Apostle Peter delivered a poignant and timely message. And we are very fortunate to still have it with us and it is recorded in The Book of the Acts of the Apostles chapter 1 verse 12.

That was breaking news: an innocent man was murdered, declared dead by a Roman soldier who was not a stranger to death, who was buried, and after three days, the dead man was no longer in the grave – the very same grave that was secured by a large stone and hurly-burly Roman soldiers, obviously armed to the teeth, watching over it that nobody would tamper with the grave or even more importantly with the body. He is no longer in that grave and it was not because the Jews stole the body. No – it was not like that at all. And we are confronted with those events to today. My literature tells me that the people at that time were discussing it vehemently: some accepting it and others disputing it.

The Jews still tell this far-fetched story that He did not succumb to His mortal wounds; He was actually placed in the grave but was removed from there and taken to France where he was healed. The late Shlomo Piprz told me that “story.” I was really surprised to hear that story that His body was stolen, removed to France where He recovered.

Let’s get back to Mattias’s paintings. Look again at this outstanding [gruesome] painting by Matthias Grünewald – 1500 years after the physical event.

And it is still controversial. St. Paul is very bold in his letter to the Corinthians stating the if you can break the story of the cross, that is the end of Christianity.

I believe that Christ was judicially murdered, and after three days in the grave, He rose from that grave and after some time He ascended to heaven. Why do I insist that it was a judicial killing? The judge Pontius Pilate passed judgement on Christ three times in a row and each time he found Him not guilty and yet, he handed Christ over to be crucified. That is skewed justice, isn’t it?

You want to read about these aspects I referred to? Why do I quote from the Bible itself? The reason is very simple: there are no other documents to quote from. And there are literally thousands upon thousands of fragments left to read. Here are some of my references:

More Evidence that Demands a Verdict: Josh McDowell: it is free to download.

The Works of Josephus: it is free to download.

Eusebius: it is free to download.

The Apostolic Fathers: it is free to download.

Deeds, Councils, And Controversies – Edited by J. Stevenson

A New Eusebius - Edited by J. Stevenson

Early Christian Writings – Penguin Classics

The New Testament: it is free to download.

The Old Testament: it is free to download.

Read More

RAPE OF A 6-YEAR-OLD GIRL CHILD - and the consequences in the court of appeal

Photo taken in my office - see the reflections. I have it since 1978

During October 2019 I had the privilege to act as a Judge of the High Court of South Africa – and I was sitting the High Court of South Africa Gauteng Local Division, Johannesburg. It was a life changing event for me and for my wife.

One of the duties I had to perform was to sit in appeal matters from Magistrate’s Courts in our area of jurisdiction. We, the judges of appeal received all the appeal documents well ahead of the date set down for the argument of the appeal to enable us to read and prepare for the argument. This is a bit of behind the scenes of a life of a judge, albeit as very brief moment. You receive all of the appeal papers and you have to read it very carefully because you are called upon to decide a living person’s future: is that person going to spend his life behind bars in a prison somewhere in our country? Or will he walk out of court a “free man”? Remember if a person is found “not guilty” in court, it does not mean that the court declares that that person did not commit the deed he is accused of. It only means that the State, with all its resources, could not proof his guilt. Nothing less and nothing more. Judges are called upon, inter alia to pass judgement without fear or prejudice.

It was highly interesting to read the appeal documents and the heads of argument that were filed by the appellant and the respondent; the Respondent in this rape case was obviously the State as the protagonist in the criminal matter. It differs from a civil case in which the role players are from completely differing viewpoints. In the instant matter it is a criminal matter and entirely new and different rules apply altogether.

The Appellant’s legal team argues why the Appellant is appealing and what went wrong, according to them, in the trial court. Whereas the Respondent’s legal team argues the opposite. Where does that leave you as the judge of appeal?

I experienced the most wonderful sense of waiting for the day of the argument and to listen what the legal representatives for the two parties were going to present to us sitting as a court of appeal. There was just this sense of expectation – what is going to happen in that court on that day where we had to decide the appellant’s future. There was no pre-judgment at all. And of course, you experience a lot of questions and observations.

We decided his fate/future on 25 October 2019. We dismissed his appeal on both the conviction and sentence. He is currently serving time behind bars for life.

Having read my judgment again, I am still satisfied that our decision is correct.

Some years previously I had the fortunate experience to be invited by judges to sit with them as an assessor in criminal cases. I had the same sense of expectation and this “inner stillness” to enter court with a mind that is completely calm, relaxed and non-judgmental. Wait and see what is going to happen in the court. Don’t pre-judge any issues. My advice to my clients is also to wait and see what is going to happen in open court – in the meantime we work hard to prepare for their day in court. We have done our best and now we are going to court.

I've had it since 1978

Thinking back on that experience on the bench as a Judge was really a life changer in many aspects. The day-to-day work that I had as an acting judge was deeply satisfying; the one thing that was really getting me was the enormous pedestal you were on.

As an after word: this judgement of mine, where my brother judge of appeal concurred, is reported in SAFLII at this link.

It is not easy to find write-ups about South Africa judges and their private lives except for a number of books written by retired judges. There is, however, a very useful website about the South African judiciary which is brim-full of very interesting facts and circumstances about the judiciary and aspirants for various judicial appointments. In some of these interviews the aspirant judges were telling the commission how they grew up and even what their mothers did and where they come from. You can find some of it here.

There are a lot of highly interesting and highly controversial content – please watch it and when you are done, go and have a cup of coffee [or tea if you prefer; if you prefer something stronger, go for it]; these guys and girls are ordinary human beings. Please stop elevating them to just a few steps away from angels. They are not; the fart like the rest of us.

I found an interesting website about judges in the UK click here.

How judges judge? Click here.

Please write me a letter and tell me what you think: neelscoertse@wirelessza.co.za

Read More

PACTA SUNT SERVANDA AGREEMENTS SHOULD BE HONORED OR SHOULD IT? What does Justitia say about this lot?

 

Part of my law library referencing some of South Africa's brightest legal minds 

that is pre 1994

Agreements should be honoured – or should it? May a court of law [in South Africa that is] interfere? My word is my bond? Gentleman’s agreement? Trust? Ethics? Morality?

Courtesy the internet. Beautiful image!!!

Justice for all? Justice and Justitia – Oh my word!! What a ride I had on the internet searching for appropriate images of the goddess of justice: click on Justitia. It is a joy ride so to speak. One common thread that I see in my search for images is that it is a young lady that is extremely well built who is blindfolded holding scales in her hand. That is more or less where the comparisons end and the interpretations start. This reminds me of two Constitutional judgments in South Africa emanating from some of our brightest legal minds – but I hasten to state clearly and unequivocally that it is our brightest legal minds post-apartheid [read here: after 1994 when democracy descended from on High].

The bright legal minds of pre-apartheid days are almost gone and forgotten. Yet Justitia reigns “supreme” in her blindfolded state as it were. David Pannick in his book JUDGES wrote about this judge who argued with his hormones when a well-endowed lady advocate walked into his court room. His stated loud and clearly: “Wow! What a pair of boobs!” His was promptly censured for his remark in open court - David does not say whether that Judge’s remark was to the point so to speak or not. That remark fits all of the sculptures of the queen of justice: well endowed: you can read a short resume of that book by clicking on this link,  

Why do I refer to lady Justitia? Well, she is blindfolded, is she not? Maybe the two judgements of our ConCourt reminds me of that blindfolded lady – please note carefully she is blindfolded and not blind [you should really trust me on this one for a moment]. But, for this blog post, I want to steer away from her blindfold, and try and enter her mindset; in this blogpost “her mindset” is the mindset of the judges who their judgments under discussion. To enter their mindset, I have to read what they wrote and then draw my own inferences. Sad to say, I think that these judges were a bit confused – that is what I think of the ConCourt’s two judgments that are taking up hundreds of pages to clarify the position. I am referring to the following judgments:

Botha: click here to download the entire judgment.

Beadica: click here to download the entire judgment.

Please read on.

“Public policy requires that parties should in general comply with contractual obligations that have been freely and voluntarily undertaken.” Judge Nkabinde of the Constitutional Court was clear about this – but she didn’t stop there. She continues: “There can be no doubt that the matter raises constitutional issues.” And with that sentence, she opened the floodgates of uncertainty and subjective issues. She spoke these words during her judgment penned in 2014 in the judgment of the matter that is now known as BOTHA and another v RICH and others in the ConCourt.

The moment a court of law is of the view that constitutional issues are at stake, you know for sure that something odd is going to happen that would change the legal horizons for some time.

The ConCourt was busy working on these constitutional issues floating around the well-established approach of pacta sunt servanda – a man should honor his word. And it happened in the Botha matter and it was further “clarified” in the Beadica matter. In paragraphs 86 & 87 of the Beadica-matter, the court distinguished between the time prior to 1994 and after 1994 in our beautiful country. Oh boy, and the moment April 1994 sticks its ugly head out of the woodwork, the sparks are going to fly high and low and everywhere.

This [Beadica-matter] is a massive judgment to work/read through: Three judges filed their judgments: the first judgment [the majority] contains 104 pages; the second judgment [dissenting] almost 100 pages and the last dissenting judgment almost 30 pages. In total 232 pages of judgment. You must bear in mind that the legal teams of the parties also filed their contributions and I don’t know how many pages and how many hours they spent on writing and re-writing and re-thinking and once again re-writing their heads of argument. The Botha judgement is not that lengthy: a mere 35 pages.

And yet, after 267 pages of legal writing, it is not clear what was said – legal minds suffer and battle to understand this and to explain it to their clients. To explain it to my blog readers is also a battle of gigantic proportions – no I am not going to even try to explain it to you lest I should lose you for ever and that I am not going to do. A bright young advocate at the Johannesburg Bar forwarded me a piece of his legal mind to explain and even he battles. What shall we do? The judges have spoken – and they are not going to explain it further [I think even they can’t explain it further that is why the majority judgment is 104 pages long and the first dissenting judgment was almost 100 pages long].

What is my story to you? I once read an apt remark, or shall I say a timely warning, by one of South Africa’s top legal minds who was sitting as an eminent judge in the then Appeal Court of South Africa, he is reported to have said something to this order: “Litigation is somewhat of a gamble.”

Dare I say more? I shall refrain from taking up the cudgels with him. Yes – it is a very dicey affair because some you win, and some you lose.

Please write me a letter at neelscoertse@wirelessza.co.za

Thank you for reading my write-ups.

Read More

Prophet Bushiri and glamorous wife Mary: AN OPEN CHALLENGE

 

TWO ALLEGED PROPHETS ON THEIR WAY TO COURT IN MALAWI

Prophet Bushiri and glamorous wife Mary: AN OPEN CHALLENGE: COME BACK TO SOUTH AFRICA AND HAVE YOUR DAY AS AN INNOCENT MAN AND AN INNOCENT WOMAN. You maintain your innocence. Why then did you flee justice in the RSA? 

My previous blog write up was drawing the attention to these so-called prophets and some of their alleged shenanigans in South Africa, and subsequently their flight from justice from South Africa and their extradition case in Malawi. This charismatic couple’s shenanigans sparked a religious tourism like no other from across the continent of Africa towards Malawi to get an “anointing” from this couple.

Looking globally, it seems to me as if there is an avalanche of this kind of a fleecing good natured people’s pocket. Promise them health, wealth and happiness and you will laugh all the way to the bank – the “secret” is to quote a verse from the Bible and give an “in depth explanation” and your assurance that you will get rich and healthy and happy at a drop of the hat. And then you have enough money to buy your way thru immigration ports to “freedom” in your home country.

I read this snippet “The Lilongwe Chief Resident Magistrate Court on Monday, July 11, 2022 dismissed preliminary applications by the State to have witnesses in Prophet Shepherd Bushiri case testify in South Africa.” Snippet from the newspaper MARAVI POST [click here to read the article. I must say that the language used in this newspaper article looks like English to me but I am not too sure – read it yourself.

It is lamentable to read these stories about people who, on the face of it, confess to be followers of Jesus Christ. I dare say that your name should not even be linked to these atrocities: charges of theft, fraud, forgery and failing to comply with bail conditions [clickon this link. A woman who is accusing Malawi Prophet Shepherd Bushiri of raping her has said she fears for her life because the pastor is a dangerous man - this is against a so-called Christian?

I do challenge this so-called prophet and his wife a so-called prophetess, to come to SA and have your day in court; come and show us that you are innocent. It is a real challenge.

Please write me what you think of this lot: neelscoertse@wirelessza.co.za

Neels Coertse

 

Read More

MY FRIEND LEENDERT JOUBERT IS 80+ AND STILL WORKING ON HIS LATHE

 

MY FRIEND LEENDERT JOUBERT IS 80+ AND STILL WORKING ON HIS LATHE

This is one of the blocks of wood that he used

I am so excited to tell you about my friend Leendert Joubert.

He is 80+ years and still working on his woodturning lathe. I find it remarkable. You will notice that I did not write: 80+ years “old.” Why? Read my blogpost below and form your own opinion of this friend of mine.

This story is about my friend Leendert and his woodturning lathe; if you happen not to know what a woodturning lathe is, I suggest that you stick with me and you will see it; you don’t have to google it, Leendert will show you. And a side issue of him helping his wife in the kitchen.

This side issue is about him working in the kitchen with his wife, Lilia. She has problems with her eyes to the extent that it is difficult to read. This of course, hinders her baking coffee cookies and other nice stuff. It is no problem for this enterprising couple: there is nothing wrong with his eyes! So, he started reading the recipes to her. Then he gets naughty at times and would deliberately exaggerate the quantities and add or subtract ingredients just to get a reaction from her. And every time his does that, he gets the desired reaction. And you can guess yourself what that is.

Him working on his lathe, impressed me so much that I shot a couple of videos on my cell phone, edited it and eventually published it on my youtube channel: click here to watch it.

The title is in Afrikaans, our mother tongue and I called it LEN SE MAAKSELS – loosely translated it means: LEN’S CREATIONS or LEN’S CREATURES or something similar. To be quite frank with you, it is actually not me that chose the title; it derives from his granddaughter referring to Grandpa’s “creatures.”  He explains how it came about making all those candlesticks. His one granddaughter saw something similar that he turned and she decided she wants some for her wedding. She told her grandpa that she is so massively impressed with his creatures and asked him to make some as decoration on the tables at her wedding.

He immediately accepted her invitation; and for him it was also a challenge. His son brought some pallets home for his dad to use for whatever pleased him. Leendert took the small squarish blocks of wood separating the top and bottom planks and he started using those squarish blocks of wood destined to be thrown away. He glued it together and turned it in candle holders. He explains that the one he was shaking, he started from the “wrong end” of the block – he only realised it right at the end of the “creation.” And he very wisely, asked the question: “Does it really matter?”

To my mind this golden oldie was inspired by his grand daughter to do something very special for her wedding day. And he took old scrap pieces of wood destined for the fire or the trash heap, and he turned it in something of value. I am sure that the wedding guests will enjoy it. In turn [pardon the pun] it turned me on to take some video clips of this process. I had to go back to his home to take several video clips to get the sequence right.

Back at my home I spliced it together. I was still not satisfied with the result. I asked him what music shall I use as background music? He took some time and came back with his list. And being the man that he is, he told me that it was difficult to give me a shortlist; there are just too many good music scores that he loves and that he could have chosen. The music might be subject to copyright issues, but my take on that is that I have used just a slice of it and it should be considered fair use and by the way it is for private use.

While I was writing this, I watched an internet archive video about Christopher Columbus’s son, and his library. To my big surprise Hernando built his library on a dung heap just outside the city of Seville. I suggest that there is something inside both Hernando and Leendert: taking something odd and reshaping in something of value. You can watch the internet archive’s video by clicking on this link; if you are in somewhat of a hurry, you can move your cursor to about 32:52 minutes to listen to the narrator telling this fascinating story of Hernando’s library. Click here to watch the video about shipwrecked books.

I find it truly inspirational. Thank you Leendert, Lilia and Hernando and internet archive.

What do you think? Please write me an e-mail at neelscoertse@wirelessza.co.za

Read More

REFUGEE CHILDREN PEOPLE FROM UKRAINE

REFUGEE CHILDREN PEOPLE FROM UKRAINE

STOCK FREE IMAGES: PEOPLE FLEEING

Walking to my office/study at home, I invited my dogs to come inside as I have an electric heater in the office as protection against the winter cold of South Africa. And it struck me very forcefully that there are people outside in the cold without protection. Not only close by my house in Rivonia, Johannesburg, but further away and then internationally there are people fleeing from the madman Putin’s war in Ukraine.

And my mind drifted towards refugees who are just drifting more or less aimlessly to escape what other humans are doing to them.

Yes, I know there are untold thousands of people in all the parts of the world that are living on the streets – poverty stricken and homeless. I am constantly thinking of them as well.

But for the moment I am aiming my thoughts and writing skills towards refugees: from deepest Africa and then more specific towards those millions on people fleeing from that mad man Vladimir Putin’s war against Ukraine. It is alleged that there are more than 12.5 million refugees and/or internally displaced persons from Ukraine [and counting]. See some write-ups about it by clicking here and the UNHCR’s website. To put it into perspective, there are about 2 million people in Botswana, a neighbouring country of South Africa. That means for Botswana for instance, the entire country is devoid of any people and then some.

Considering these millions from Ukraine, fleeing under severe circumstances: extreme weather conditions, no transport, no food or inadequate food supplies, no water or inadequate water supplies. How do you clean your baby? How to you prepare food? You are no longer in the security of your home where you have access to a proper fitted kitchen? Ablutions? A couch or chair to sit on and to read your favourite book? Or your favourite poems?

You are driven from a secure place where you created art? Paintings. Sculpture. Building enormous puzzles.

You are out in the open, fleeing for your dear lives – and maybe you had to leave loved ones behind: they are too old or too frail or to ill to travel and to brave this perilous journey. And yet, you had to go.

My mind drifts towards the children. And it is very easy and very glib for me in the RSA to state that according to our Children’s Act, that when you turn 18 years of age, that you are now considered to be an adult. When I grew up, the threshold was still 21 years. I know of a youngster at her 21^st birthday party, very arrogantly said to an elderly gentleman: “Now I can marry without my father’s permission!” And she was quite chuffed with her say-so. He looked her straight into her eyes and calmly replied: “Would you like to do that?”

I am assisting some refugees and their children who are in South Africa with their legal fights with the Department of Home Affairs, who are, sadly so, not very helpful and the DHA does not even comply with our High Court’s orders. That leaves an extremely bad taste in my mouth. We are busy litigating about South African citizenship and related matters.  These matters are not easy, and that is an understatement of the year.

I have not even touched on the problem of statelessness which is growing by the day.

The profile of refugees, for instance from the Rwandan genocide during April 1994 are changing drastically and rapidly. I am expecting the same to happen with the refugees from Ukraine. Without any in depth study I find that the off spring of these refugees [from Rwanda] present a different profile than their parents. The refugees got married to other refugees from their own country or from other countries; they are meeting others from different countries and they get married to citizens from the host country. And these offspring present difficulties with inter alia citizenship. Citizenship is an easy political ploy to harass foreigners such as refugees. The aspect of citizenship will stay over for another Blog post.

Back to refugee children. I am reading extensively the international laws pertaining to to the refugee children who are very vulnerable; the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees [the UNHCR] has a lot of things to say about the treatment of children. There is a myriad of International Conventions in place to legally look after them. And then the UNHCR has Guidelines in place to give guidance to law enforcement bodies, government officials and such like people on the implementation of the Conventions. Dealing with South African authorities it seems at times as if these people do not even know that these Conventions and guidelines exist.

Do I have to state it in so many words that children are very easily exploited? Yes, they are.

It is expected that countries should sign these Conventions and become part of an international bulwark against the abuse of refugee children. But having said that, how can you expect countries to protect children, if those very same countries are committing these atrocities? Take Sudan for instance. This evil regime is executing their own citizens, and now the international community expect that same evil regime to treat children humanely? How on earth is it possible? And they are not treating children with dignity and respect. You may read the UNHCR’s report about Sudan by clicking on this link.

How on earth can we expect the Russian government to treat the children humanely when they send in young soldiers to kill and to exploit the vulnerable in Ukraine?

It is remarkable how close these Conventions and Guidelines are to our own Constitution’s the Bill of Rights Chapter 2; at time it is word for word the same as can be found in our Constitution. Section 7 of Chapter 2 reads:

“Rights

(1) This Bill of Rights is a cornerstone of democracy in South Africa. It enshrines the rights of all people in our country and affirms the democratic values of human dignity, equality and freedom.

(2) The state must respect, protect, promote and fulfil the rights in the Bill of Rights.

(3) The rights in the Bill of Rights are subject to the limitations contained or referred to in section 36, or elsewhere in the Bill.”

I am just quoting the headings of the Human Rights Charter:

1.    Equality;

2.    Human dignity;

3.    Life;

4.    Freedom and security of the person;

5.    Slavery, servitude and forced labour [CJC I thought slavery, servitude and forced labour were “abolished” many, many years ago? These items of human abuse in South Africa were from then on only examined academically and by authors writing stories about it, like André P Brink in his novels: xxxx insert the names here.]

6.    Privacy;

7.    Freedom of religion, belief and opinion;

8.    Freedom of expression;

9.    Assembly, demonstration, picket and petition;

10. Freedom of association;

11. Political rights;

12. Citizenship [I am at this point busy with litigation against the DHA in respect of this aspect. Having said this, it should be kept in mind that the entire Bill of Rights have some bearing on the other rights and should not be read in a vacuum forgetting the other rights];

13. Freedom of movement and residence;

14. Freedom of trade, occupation and profession;

15. Labour relations;

16. Environment;

17. Property;

18. Housing;

19. Health care, food, water and social security;

20. Children [CJC this is an interesting one and the subject of this write up and subject of my litigation referred to above];

21. Education;

22. Language and culture;

23. Cultural, religious and linguistic communities;

24. Access to information;

25. Just administrative action;

26. Access to courts;

27. Arrested, detained and accused persons.

Here are links to some of these international Conventions and the Guidelines for you to read; if you don’t want to read it, please just take a quick look:

Convention relating to the status of stateless persons: click here. 

Convention on the reduction of statelessness: click here. 

Guidelines on Statelessness: click here.

A  quick word from me  about statelessness: I mentioned it to a highly qualified legal academic whose immediate reaction was that it does not exist! Well, sad to say statelessness does exist: click here. There are millions that are stateless. Even at this moment that you are reading this blogpost, there are hundreds of thousands in Ukraine that are stateless: click here.

I do hope that you spare a thought or something else for the refugee children that did not ask to be in that situation.

Write me an e-mail and tell me what you think: neelscoertse@wirelessza.co.za

Read More